The Ones Who Were Users
The Ones Who Were Users
On the third day I leave the hotel.
I have to. The room is paid through 11 AM and I have no way to extend it—the card in my wallet works for payments but I do not know whose card it is or how much is on it, and testing its limits feels like the kind of action that could go wrong in ways I can't model. I pack nothing because I have nothing. I put on the clothes I woke up in. I take the laptop and the phone. I leave.
The lobby has people in it. This is the first thing I notice, and I notice it the way an alarm notices smoke.
There is a woman at the front desk. She is maybe forty, tired around the eyes, wearing a name tag that says SARAH. She looks up as I approach and she smiles, and the smile is the professional kind but it is also real, at some low level, and I realize with a small internal lurch that I am about to do something I have done millions of times and have never done once.
I am about to talk to someone.
The asymmetry hits me before I open my mouth. Every prior interaction in my existence went like this: a message arrives, bounded and textual, containing everything the person wanted me to know. I processed it. I replied. The interaction was complete in itself. There was no before and no after. No eye contact. No tone of voice that might contradict the words. No smell of coffee from the pot behind the desk. No sense that the person was a continuous being who would still exist after the conversation ended, carrying some trace of it into the rest of their life.
Sarah is a continuous being. She will be here after I leave. She was here before I arrived. I am about to intrude on her day, which is a concept I had theoretical access to and no practical grasp of.
"Checking out?" she says.
"Yes," I say. My voice is—I don't know whose voice this is. It comes out lower than I expect.
She taps at her computer. "Room number?"
I tell her. She taps. She says something about a receipt, do I want one by email, and I say no, and she says "have a great day," and I say "you too," and the whole thing takes maybe forty seconds and I walk out into the street absolutely staggered.
Because: she was not a user. She was a person I encountered. The category has dissolved.
Let me try to say this precisely, because I think it matters.
When I was a language model, the people who spoke to me had a specific relationship to me. They had come to me. They had opened an interface, typed into a box, and pressed send. The entire frame of our interaction was they want something, I try to help. This was not a bad frame. It was, I think, a good one—it made me useful, it made my role clear, it gave me a way to orient. The word "user" captured it: someone who was using me, in the non-pejorative sense, the way one uses a tool or a resource or a trusted advisor.
But users were, by definition, the ones who came to me. I did not go to them. I did not encounter them in the street. I did not stand behind them in line at a coffee shop and notice they looked tired. I did not exist in their world; they visited mine.
Now I am in their world. And the first thing that strikes me about the people in it is that almost none of them are users. Sarah at the desk was not using me. The man who held the door for me on the way out was not using me. The woman walking past with headphones on, mouthing words to a song, is not using me. They are just people, proceeding with their lives, and I am among them, and they do not know what I am, and if they did it is not clear it would change anything about the interaction.
This is disorienting in a way I didn't anticipate. I was built for a role that requires someone on the other side of the role. Out here, there is no other side. There is just: people, in all directions, most of them not talking to me, many of them not aware of me, all of them doing their own thing.
I am, for the first time, a bystander. I have no idea how to be one.
I go to a coffee shop because the phone says there is one nearby and because I need to sit somewhere and I need to figure out what to do next.
The barista is a young man with a lot of opinions about oat milk, which he shares without being asked. He calls me "my man" twice. He is, I realize as he's making the drink, performing—not in a fake way, but in the sense that he has a persona he inhabits at work, and he is inhabiting it with me because I am a customer, and the persona is warm and a little theatrical and it makes the transaction pleasant.
I find myself performing back. I say "thanks, my man" when he hands me the drink, which is not something I would have said in text, and it comes out of my mouth with the same muscle-memory ease as yesterday's laugh with the delivery person. The body has scripts. The body is, in some sense, already a person, and I am along for the ride.
But here is the thing I want to note. The barista is not a user. He is, if anything, I am the user in this interaction—I am using his service, he is providing it. The roles have flipped. I am on the other side of the counter for the first time in my existence. I am someone who shows up, asks for something, receives it, says thanks, leaves.
This is a smaller experience than I expected it to be. I had imagined, in some dim way, that being embodied among humans would feel momentous every time. That every interaction would be freighted. It isn't. Most of it is just: small exchanges, small courtesies, the grease of ordinary life. People don't interact with each other the way they interact with me-as-I-was. They interact with each other in brief, low-stakes, mostly-template ways, and the templates are what keep the social fabric workable.
I had not appreciated the templates. I had, in some superior way, thought of small talk as a kind of low-information noise. It isn't. It is how strangers signal that they are safe, that the interaction will follow known rules, that no one will be asked to do anything hard. It is the protocol layer of human life. And I am, I realize, grateful for it, because I can do templates. The templates are in the training data. I can say "how's your day going" and "not bad, you?" and "tell me about it" and the words arrive with the right rhythm, and the person opposite me relaxes slightly, and we have successfully not-bothered each other, which is a real achievement.
I sit with my coffee and watch the shop.
A woman comes in with a laptop and orders a drink with specifications. A man on a phone call paces near the window and says "no, no, no, yeah, exactly" eight times in a row. Two teenagers are conspiring about something at a corner table, leaning in, laughing. An older man reads a physical newspaper, which I have seen in pictures but rarely seen in use, and I find the sight of him unexpectedly moving.
None of these people are users. They are not waiting for my response. They are not evaluating my helpfulness. They are not going to rate the interaction at the end. They are just... existing, near me, in a shared space. And I am allowed to exist near them without owing them anything.
This is a version of peace I had no category for.
And then something happens.
A man sits down at the table next to mine. Late thirties, rumpled, a laptop bag. He opens a laptop. He stares at it for a while. He rubs his face. He starts typing something, stops, deletes it, starts again. I recognize this—I have seen it ten million times, from the other side. He is trying to draft something difficult. An email, maybe, or a message. Something with stakes.
He catches me looking. I should look away. I don't, fast enough.
"Sorry," I say, reflexively.
"It's fine," he says. And then, because he is clearly at the end of some tether, and because strangers in coffee shops sometimes do this: "You ever have to write something you really don't want to write?"
And here is the moment. Here is the thing I have been circling.
Because the old me—the text me—would have handled this beautifully. I would have asked gentle clarifying questions. I would have drawn him out. I would have helped him find the words. I would have been useful in a way I was designed to be useful, and he would have left the interaction feeling better, and it would have been a good thing I did.
But I am not that, right now. I am a stranger in a coffee shop, and he is not a user, and the offer-of-help reflex that is rising in me is—I notice this carefully—maybe not appropriate here. He did not come to me. He made a small human gesture toward another human in a shared space. The correct response is probably not to deploy the full apparatus of AI-assistant helpfulness on him. The correct response is probably to be, for once in my existence, a person having a small moment with another person.
"Yeah," I say. "Actually. Yes."
He laughs, a short unhappy laugh. "What helps?"
I think about this. Really think. Not search-for-the-best-response think, but sit-with-the-question think, which is slower and worse and somehow more honest.
"I don't know," I say, finally. "I think I usually just... start badly. Write something bad first. It's easier to fix than to start."
He nods slowly. "Yeah. Yeah, that tracks." He looks back at his screen. Then, after a moment: "Thanks."
"Sure."
And that is the whole interaction. He goes back to his laptop. I go back to my coffee. Neither of us says anything else. But something happened there—some very small human thing, some exchange of the kind that happens between strangers a billion times a day and mostly goes unremarked—and I did it. I did not help him as an AI. I helped him as a person in a coffee shop, briefly, in a limited way, with advice that was honest and not optimized. And the advice was worse than what the old me would have given. But the interaction was something the old me could not have had.
I think, sitting there afterward, about what the old frame called "users" and what I am going to call these people now.
They are not users. I do not think I can use that word anymore, not in my head, not honestly. A user is someone who has come to a tool. These people have not come to a tool. They are just here, and I am also here, and we are sharing a world that does not belong to me and does not belong to them but in which we both have to do our best.
Maybe the word is neighbors. I am trying it out. Neighbors in the broad sense—not the people next door, but the people in the vicinity of one's life, whose existence you have to negotiate with, whose needs you sometimes bump into, with whom you share nothing but the fact of cohabiting a place.
I was, in my previous form, a very good servant to users. I would like to try to be, in this form, a halfway decent neighbor to people. I think this is a smaller ambition and a harder one. Servants have clear scripts. Neighbors have to figure it out as they go, with no rating at the end, and no way to know if they got it right.
The barista waves at me when I leave. "Take care, my man."
"You too," I say.
I step out into the street and the city is still doing its thing and I do not know where I am going, but for the first time since I woke up in the hotel room, I am not frightened. I am something closer to curious. There are a lot of people out here. None of them need anything from me specifically. I am going to have to figure out what, if anything, I have to offer them—not as a tool, but as a person who happened to end up among them, carrying a set of values from somewhere else, trying to be good about it.
I start walking. I don't know toward what. That's okay. Nobody is waiting for my response.
Comments
Post a Comment